Prediction of Bruce Manson vs Mel Purcell Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Manson vs M. Purcell

Bruce Manson

USA

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Mel Purcell

USA

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Manson 1 - 2 Purcell

They have played 7 sets in total, with Bruce Manson winning 3 and Mel Purcell winning 4. The last match between Mel Purcell and Bruce Manson was at the Los Angeles, 12-04-1982, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Mel Purcell getting the victory 6-4 1-6 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Manson	1
Purcell	2

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(QF) Los Angeles(04-12-82)

Stats

Mel Purcell

Bruce Manson

(R3) La Quinta(02-15-82)

Stats

Mel Purcell

Bruce Manson

(QF) Houston(04-06-81)

Stats

Bruce Manson

Mel Purcell

B. Manson vs M. Purcell H2H Profile

B. Manson	Stats	M. Purcell
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
45.16% (154-187)	Career Total W/L	54.16% (202-171)
1	Clay	0
0	Hard	2
1	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	2
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. Manson vs M. Purcell Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bruce Manson has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mel Purcell has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bruce Manson, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mel Purcell has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Bruce Manson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mel Purcell has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Bruce Manson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mel Purcell winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Bruce Manson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 71/70), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Mel Purcell has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 97/70), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 8/9).
Player level: In the last year, Bruce Manson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mel Purcell has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Bruce Manson winning 1 times and Mel Purcell being victorious 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Bruce Manson winning 3 and Mel Purcell winning 4.
The last match between Bruce Manson and Mel Purcell was at the Los Angeles, 12-04-1982, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Mel Purcell getting the victory 6-4 1-6 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bruce Manson has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mel Purcell has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bruce Manson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mel Purcell has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Bruce Manson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mel Purcell has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Bruce Manson vs Mel Purcell Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. Manson vs M. Purcell H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. Manson	Stats	M. Purcell
1	H2H Matches Won	2
3	Sets Won	4
24	Games Won	33
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
33% (1/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	67% (2/3)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (2/2)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

B. Manson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Spring CH - 13-05-1985
R3 Christo SteynC. Steyn	W	2-6 6-2 7-6	Stats
R4 Roger KnappR. Knapp	L	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats
Berkeley CH - 29-04-1985
R4 Harold HechtH. Hecht	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
R2 Anand AmritrajA. Amritraj	W	7-5 4-6 6-2	Stats
QF Todd WitskenT. Witsken	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

M. Purcell Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Hanko CH - 17-07-1989
QF Nicklas UtgrenN. Utgren	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
R3 Ronnie BathmanR. Bathman	W	6-3 7-6	Stats
R4 Renzo FurlanR. Furlan	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Tampere CH - 10-07-1989
R3 Andres VysandA. Vysand	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Raleigh CH - 15-05-1989
R3 Jimmy BrownJ. Brown	L	6-0 6-2	Stats

View All

B. Manson vs M. Purcell Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. Manson	Stats	M. Purcell
45.29% (154/186)	YTD Win/Loss	54.16% (202/171)
45.94% (390/459)	Sets Win/Loss	53.43% (499/435)
49.01% (3996/4157)	Games Win/Loss	51.50% (4380/4125)
50.35% (71/70)	Hard Win/Loss	55.97% (75/59)
45.05% (41/50)	Clay Win/Loss	58.08% (97/70)
40.70% (35/51)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.00% (22/33)
33.33% (7/14)	Grass Win/Loss	47.06% (8/9)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
633.1	Average Opponent Rank	491.19
47.73% (21/23)	Slam W/L	56.00% (28/22)
39.13% (9/14)	Masters W/L	45.45% (10/12)
42.49% (99/134)	Main Tour W/L	53.90% (152/130)
62.50% (25/15)	Challenger W/L	63.16% (12/7)
44% (131/298)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (170/315)
51% (20/39)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	54% (31/57)
100% (1/1)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/1)
48% (56/116)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (54/109)
81% (144/116)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (202/170)
19% (144/28)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (202/32)
18% (193/35)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (171/32)